Is this costing you?

Urban renewal tax • City’s renewal areas thrive, but costs are borne by all

By Jim Redden

The Portland Tribune, Nov 5, 2009, Updated Nov 6, 2009 (9 Reader comments)

L.E. BASKOW / TRIBUNE PHOTO

The new Broadstone Enso Apartment Building is being completed in the Pearl District – an area that is perhaps the most prominent example of urban renewal success in Portland. Recent tax statements show how all Portland property owners are paying for urban renewal-supported projects in the Pearl and elsewhere.

Over the past year, a series of controversies have swirled around Portland’s urban renewal program.

First, Multnomah County Chair Ted Wheeler complained when the City Council considered creating a new urban renewal area to help renovate PGE Park for a Major League Soccer team. Then, many Southeast Portland residents objected when Commissioner Randy Leonard proposed using urban renewal funds to build a Triple-A baseball stadium in Lents Park. And most recently, a legal challenge prompted the council to scale back the planned expansion of a downtown urban renewal area that includes the Pearl District.

The council also dropped plans to send some urban renewal funds from that area – called the River District – across town to the David Douglas School District in East Portland for a new school.

The way the controversies unfolded makes it seem as though urban renewal only affects specific parts of town – the 11 urban renewal areas created by the council and administered by the Portland Development Commission that cover approximately 14 percent of the city.

But in fact, all Portland residents have a stake in the program, as revealed by the property tax bills that began arriving in the mail last month. That’s because urban renewal taxes affect all properties in Portland, not just those in the 11 renewal areas. The amount, which adds up to hundreds of dollars on the typical homeowner’s tax bill, is included on a line that reads, “Urban Renewal – Portland.” It is the last line in the column of “general government taxes” that includes the city of Portland, the Port of Portland, Metro, Multnomah County and several property tax levies.

“Urban renewal is a city program, and it is financed by all city residents and businesses that pay property taxes,” says Tom Linhares, executive director of the Multnomah County Tax Supervising and Conservation Commission, an agency that represents the public interest on budget matters.

More than that, the urban renewal portion of the city property tax bill is increasing much faster than the rest of it – jumping nearly 14 percent for urban renewal this year, compared with around 6 percent for the overall city tax bill. And the urban renewal increase happened without a formal vote by the council.

So, why then, are urban renewal taxes increasing so fast? The answer, according to Linhares, lies in a quirk in the complicated property tax limitation system created when Oregon voters passed Ballot Measure 50 in 1997. Although Measure 50 was intended to limit the automatic year-to-year growth of property taxes to 3 percent a year, it allows urban renewal taxes to automatically increase much faster.

“Measure 50 was a godsend for urban renewal,” Linhares says.

A remarkable success

Operating out of a small suite of modest office on the 15th floor of the downtown Portland Building, Linhares is one of the few people in the state who understands the ins and outs of the post-Measure 50 property tax system. Even Wheeler, who has made understanding urban renewal financing a top priority, defers to Linhares on the subject.

“If Tom says that’s how it works, that’s how it works,” Wheeler says.

Linhares is not an urban renewal critic. He notes that Portland’s program appears to be remarkably successful – the assessed value of the land within the city’s urban renewal areas is increasing much faster than the assessed value of the rest of the city. According to figures generated by Linhares at the request of the Portland Tribune, the assessed value within the areas increased almost 15 percent this year compared to just over 3 percent for the rest of the city.

The difference is explained by the large number of new construction projects taking place within the urban renewal areas. And the disproportionate increase in assessed value does not even include public projects, such as the new and improved streets and transit systems that support the private projects that are going on the tax rolls.

“That’s what urban renewal is supposed to do, generate redevelopment projects,” Linhares says.

But under Measure 50, the disproportionate growth in assessed value is compounded by a disproportionate growth in the urban renewal tax rate. As Linhares explains it, Portland’s urban renewal tax rate is a combination of all other tax rates that apply to Portland properties, including those for the rest of city government, the county, Metro and the schools. And city voters increased the total rate last year by approving three new tax measures – one for the Portland Children’s Fund, one for the Oregon Zoo and one for Portland Community County.

As a result, the urban renewal tax rate increased more than 10 percent this year.

The effect on the tax bill is clear from two examples Linhares produced at the request of the Portland Tribune. They compare property taxes assessed against the average Portland home in 2008 and 2009.

According to Linhares, in 2008, the average Portland home had an assessed value of $149,865 and a total tax bill of $3,174.74. By 2009, the assessed value had increased to $154,500 and the tax bill had grown to $3,366.03 – slightly more than a 6-percent increase.

The urban renewal portion of the tax bill increased much faster, however – $324.40 to $369.04, or nearly 14 percent. Total urban renewal taxes collected by the city will increase from around $94 million last year to a little more than $106 million this year.

What if there were no renewal?

That does not mean, however, that property tax bills would fall if there were no urban renewal program. As Linhares notes, under Measure 50, urban renewal taxes are essentially deducted from all other taxing jurisdictions. That is why Wheeler complained when the council proposed creating a new westside urban renewal area earlier this year. Because of how the limitation works, the county will be unable to collect about $22 million in property taxes for general government purposes this year – an increase of approximately $5 million from last year.

1 | 2 Next Page >>

Facebook	Digg	Del.icio.us
Newsvine	Stumbleupon	Reddit